Role of Universities in successfully commercialising research projects

In 2023 and beyond, one central role of Universities across the world is to commercialise research projects successfully.

This requires the multifaceted management of many interested parties.

The critical roles played by Universities in the commercialisation process include:

1. Education and Training: Universities must equip students and Researchers with the necessary skills and knowledge for successful commercialisation, including entrepreneurship, business management, and industry-specific expertise.
2. Intellectual property (IP) management: Universities typically have technology transfer offices (TTOs) that should help co-manage and protect intellectual property rights, facilitating the licensing and commercialisation of research outputs.
3. Networking and collaboration: Universities should act as catalysts for collaboration between researchers, industry partners, and investors, providing a platform for sharing ideas, resources, and expertise.
4. Incubation and acceleration: Universities often host or are associated sponsors with incubators and accelerators that provide resources, mentorship, and perhaps funding to help start-ups and spin-offs commercialise research projects.
5. Access to funding: Universities can help researchers secure funding for commercialisation efforts through grants, partnerships with industry, equity sharing, or connections with venture capital firms and angel investors.
6. Adaptive Policy and Advocacy: Universities contribute to shaping policies and regulations that promote and facilitate the commercialisation of research, including advocating for better funding, IP protection, and other support mechanisms.
7. Social and economic impact: By driving the commercialisation of research, universities can contribute to job creation, economic growth, and improved communal quality of life in their regions and beyond.
8. Public engagement and outreach: Universities aim to help raise awareness about the value and potential for research commercialisation, encouraging support and investment from the public, industry, and government.
9. Evaluation and benchmarking: Universities are crucial in monitoring and assessing research commercialisation efforts' success, helping identify best practices and improve strategies for future projects.
10. Knowledge creation and dissemination: Universities are hubs for cutting-edge research, enabling the generation of new ideas, technologies, and innovations that can be commercialised.

Universities do a fantastic job

• being vital in commercialising research projects
• provide the necessary initial infrastructure, resources, and expertise to translate ideas into market-ready products and services.

While universities play this crucial role, there are instances where this process needs repair, and problems can arise, leading to inefficiencies and significant challenges.

Unfortunately the universities' effective role may stumble at times

Some factors that may contribute to these breakdowns include:

1. Inadequate funding: Limited financial resources can hinder the ability of researchers and universities to commercialise their innovations, leading to delays or projects being abandoned altogether.

   • Early funding traditionally comes from grants; this helps the University side of the equation but not the start-up that may have licensed the IP.
   • Indeed, the constant need for the Researcher to bring in funding or work with many varied research collaborators from the spin-off projects may lead to them wanting to bring "unprotected" licenced projects back into the University arena to the detriment of the start-up's successful traction in the commercial world.
   • One must implement Research service agreements if a start-up brings its licensed IP back to the University workspaces/labs for any reason.

2. Complex bureaucracy and red tape: Excessive administrative processes and rigid protectionist institutional structures may impede commercialisation, making it difficult for researchers to navigate and secure necessary approvals and resources.

   • At times of trouble in a spin-off start-up, the University may primarily try to protect its reputation. Leading to them stepping away - fast!
   • This is not indicative of authentic leadership.

3. Insufficient support infrastructure: A lack of appropriate incubators, accelerators, or technology/ innovation transfer offices can impede the commercialisation of research, limiting access to resources and expertise.

   • Or these technology transfer offices exist on campus, but they are understaffed, underfunded, or employ inexperienced people.

4. Ineffective IP management: Mismanagement or inadequate protection of intellectual property rights may lead to legal disputes or loss of valuable IP, undermining the commercial potential of research projects.

   • This is crucial when dealing with IP being developed in several sites - the start-up and the University.
   • This requires careful monitoring, documentation and regular auditing. Not doing regular reviews and transparent audits is poor practice and demonstrates insufficient attention to standard good governance processes.

5. Limited collaboration opportunities: Insufficient Networking and collaboration between researchers, industry partners, and investors can lead to missed opportunities for commercialisation and a lack of necessary resources and expertise.
6. Business Skills gap: Researchers may lack the necessary entrepreneurial and business skills to commercialise their research successfully, resulting in stalled or failed ventures. Researchers may not be self-aware enough to understand their deficiencies.
7. Cultural and mindset barriers: Academic cultures may prioritise publication and research prestige over commercialisation efforts, leading to a lack of incentives and genuine support for Researchers looking to commercialise their work.

8. Conflicted interests: Conflicts between the goals of academia and the demands of an industry may make it difficult for Universities to support commercialisation efforts effectively.

   • A COI policy may be used but not practically followed, not updated, or the whole process may be left to the Researcher to self-administer and self-adjudicate.
   • How often have you heard - "Yes, I have completed my COI document."
   • It doesn't mean much in real terms if this isn't reviewed independently and audited regularly - without blinding self-interest from all parties.
   • Universities may be reluctant to identify conflicts of interest because this may hamper progress, harm reputations or impede funding.
   • Tough decisions require tough leadership - not internal protectionism.

9. Poor Regulatory / Policy constraints: Unfavorable policies or regulations can hinder the commercialisation of research projects, particularly in industries with strict compliance requirements.

   • This can lead to policies that aren't followed or don't mean anything in practical terms.
   • A policy is only as good as the action and reaction that it creates.
   • Policies without action are meaningless and self-serving. Let's face it - we all know examples of this.

10. Inefficient evaluation and benchmarking: Without effective monitoring and assessment of commercialisation efforts, Universities may struggle to identify or instigate best practices to improve governance strategies for current or future projects.

These breakdowns can limit the ability of universities to support the commercialisation of Research projects.

To address these challenges, institutions may need to invest more time and funds in better infrastructure to create more streamlined administrative processes and foster a meaningful culture supporting collaboration, innovation, and entrepreneurship.

Likewise, successfully commercialising research projects requires a well-coordinated and carefully layered infrastructure involving the University and the researcher-founder.

Universities foster groundbreaking research and contribute greatly to translating this knowledge into practical applications for the betterment of industry and society.

Each party plays a critical role in ensuring the smooth transition of research from the academic setting to a viable commercial enterprise.

Here are some critical components of this infrastructure: (some points are remade on purpose because of their importance)

1. Innovation or Technology transfer offices (TTOs): Universities should establish dedicated TTOs to identify, protect, and commercialise research projects. Does that mean protecting the project or the University - (I'll let you answer that one).

   • TTOs can provide support with intellectual property management, licensing agreements, and connecting researchers with potential investors and industry partners. However, when there are problems, the Innovation office should act in a neutral professional manner.
   • Too often, they may be tempted to retreat to "protect our reputation at all costs." The measure of the office is how they respond to challenging situations for all parties.

2. Clear policies and guidelines: Universities should develop transparent policies and procedures for intellectual property rights, conflict of interest, and equity distribution, which provide a framework for Researcher-Founders to navigate the commercialisation process better. But that is only the beginning. The policies need to be acted on.

   • These policies should improve critical review, further discussion, and advance recommendations.
   • Conflict of Interest - COI policies shouldn't be automated online. They should not be a tick box item without oversight.
   • Good governance, accurate assessment, and regular auditing of a COI plan are essential. But, importantly, COI shouldn't be given lip service.
   • Nor should it be left to the Researcher / Founder to "do their own" without experienced follow-on and professional accountability.

3. Training and mentorship: Universities should offer business training programs, governance workshops, and mentorship opportunities for researcher-founders to develop entrepreneurial and business skills.

   • Helping them better manage and grow their start-ups.
   • These programs should be free as the Researcher /Founder and the start-up are - in the best circumstances provide significant kudos to the University.

4. Access to resources and facilities: Universities should (not could) support researcher-founders by providing access to these essential resources and facilities, including items such as lab space, equipment, and administrative support, during the early stages of the start-up venture.
5. Stimulate Networking and collaboration: Universities can help foster connections between researcher-founders, industry partners, investors, and experienced entrepreneurs through networking events, conferences, and collaborative programs.

Try creating a supportive and efficiently layered infrastructure; so universities can work with Researcher-Founders to effectively commercialise joint research projects.

Our shared goal in this area should always be to drive improved growth and further success for University lead spin-off/start-up teams.

© Copyright Creative Thinking Institute Pty Ltd. 2023 Terms and Conditions